Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XXXIX-B5, 595-599, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B5-595-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
26 Sep 2012
COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR GEOMETRIC CAMERA CALIBRATION
J. Hieronymus Computer Vision Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
Keywords: Geometric Camera Calibration, Distortion Modelling, Accuracy Comparison, Algorithms Abstract. Methods for geometric calibration of cameras in close-range photogrammetry are established and well investigated. The most common one is based on test-fields with well-known pattern, which are observed from different directions. The parameters of a distortion model are calculated using bundle-block-adjustment-algorithms. This methods works well for short focal lengths, but is essentially more problematic to use with large focal lengths. Those would require very large test-fields and surrounding space. To overcome this problem, there is another common method for calibration used in remote sensing. It employs measurements using collimator and a goniometer. A third calibration method uses diffractive optical elements (DOE) to project holograms of well known pattern. In this paper these three calibration methods are compared empirically, especially in terms of accuracy. A camera has been calibrated with those methods mentioned above. All methods provide a set of distortion correction parameters as used by the photogrammetric software Australis. The resulting parameter values are very similar for all investigated methods. The three sets of distortion parameters are crosscompared against all three calibration methods. This is achieved by inserting the gained distortion parameters as fixed input into the calibration algorithms and only adjusting the exterior orientation. The RMS (root mean square) of the remaining image coordinate residuals are taken as a measure of distortion correction quality. There are differences resulting from the different calibration methods. Nevertheless the measure is small for every comparison, which means that all three calibration methods can be used for accurate geometric calibration.
Conference paper (PDF, 305 KB)


Citation: Hieronymus, J.: COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR GEOMETRIC CAMERA CALIBRATION, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XXXIX-B5, 595-599, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B5-595-2012, 2012.

BibTeX EndNote Reference Manager XML