- Article
(1547 KB) - Metadata XML
- April 08, 2024
- |
- Home
- |
- Sitemap
- |
- The ISPRS Foundation
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Articles | Volume XLIII-B5-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2020-243-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2020-243-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
24 Aug 2020
| 24 Aug 2020
TRAINING IN INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR CLOSE-RANGE SENSING IN ALPINE TERRAIN – 3RD EDITION
M. Rutzinger
Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria
Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Austria
K. Anders
GIScience, Institute of Geography, Heidelberg University, Germany
M. Bremer
Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria
Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Austria
GIScience, Institute of Geography, Heidelberg University, Germany
R. Lindenbergh
Dept. of Geoscience & Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
S. Oude Elberink
ITC – Faculty of Geo-Information Sciences and Earth Observation, University of Twente, The Netherlands
F. Pirotti
Interdepartmental Research Center of Geomatics (CIRGEO), University of Padova, Italy
M. Scaioni
Department of Architecture, Build Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai, P.R. China
T. Zieher
Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria
Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Related authors
M. Potůčková, J. Albrechtová, K. Anders, L. Červená, J. Dvořák, K. Gryguc, B. Höfle, L. Hunt, Z. Lhotáková, A. Marcinkowska-Ochtyra, A. Mayr, E. Neuwirthová, A. Ochtyra, M. Rutzinger, A. Šedová, A. Šrollerů, and L. Kupková
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 989–996, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-989-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-989-2023, 2023
Jan Pfeiffer, Thomas Zieher, Jan Schmieder, Thom Bogaard, Martin Rutzinger, and Christoph Spötl
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2219–2237, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2219-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2219-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The activity of slow-moving deep-seated landslides is commonly governed by pore pressure variations within the shear zone. Groundwater recharge as a consequence of precipitation therefore is a process regulating the activity of landslides. In this context, we present a highly automated geo-statistical approach to spatially assess groundwater recharge controlling the velocity of a deep-seated landslide in Tyrol, Austria.
A. B. Voordendag, B. Goger, C. Klug, R. Prinz, M. Rutzinger, and G. Kaser
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 1093–1099, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1093-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1093-2022, 2022
V. Zahs, L. Winiwarter, K. Anders, M. Bremer, M. Rutzinger, M. Potůčková, and B. Höfle
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 1109–1116, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1109-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1109-2022, 2022
B. Hiebl, A. Mayr, A. Kollert, M. Rutzinger, M. Bremer, N. Helm, and K. Chytry
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 367–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-367-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-367-2022, 2022
L. Müller, M. Rutzinger, A. Mayr, and A. Kollert
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 391–398, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-391-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-391-2022, 2022
A. B. Voordendag, B. Goger, C. Klug, R. Prinz, M. Rutzinger, and G. Kaser
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2021, 153–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-153-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-153-2021, 2021
A. Kollert, M. Rutzinger, M. Bremer, K. Kaufmann, and T. Bork-Hüffer
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-4-2021, 201–208, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-201-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-201-2021, 2021
A. Mayr, M. Bremer, and M. Rutzinger
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 765–772, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-765-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-765-2020, 2020
J. Boehm, M. Rutzinger, B. Yang, M. Weinmann, B. Riveiro, and W. Yao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 915–917, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-915-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-915-2019, 2019
M. Bremer, V. Wichmann, M. Rutzinger, T. Zieher, and J. Pfeiffer
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 943–950, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-943-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-943-2019, 2019
J. Boehm, M. Rutzinger, B. Yang, M. Weinmann, B. Riveiro, and W. Yao
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 313–315, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-313-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-313-2019, 2019
A. Mayr, M. Bremer, M. Rutzinger, and C. Geitner
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 405–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-405-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-405-2019, 2019
J. Pfeiffer, T. Zieher, M. Rutzinger, M. Bremer, and V. Wichmann
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 421–428, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-421-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-421-2019, 2019
T. Zieher, M. Bremer, M. Rutzinger, J. Pfeiffer, P. Fritzmann, and V. Wichmann
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 461–467, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-461-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-461-2019, 2019
A. Mayr, M. Rutzinger, and C. Geitner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 691–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-691-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-691-2018, 2018
T. Zieher, I. Toschi, F. Remondino, M. Rutzinger, Ch. Kofler, A. Mejia-Aguilar, and R. Schlögel
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1243–1250, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1243-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1243-2018, 2018
Thomas Zieher, Martin Rutzinger, Barbara Schneider-Muntau, Frank Perzl, David Leidinger, Herbert Formayer, and Clemens Geitner
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 971–992, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-971-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-971-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
At catchment scale, it is challenging to provide the required input parameters for physically based slope stability models. In the present study, the parameterization of such a model is optimized against observed shallow landslides during two triggering rainfall events. With the resulting set of parameters the model reproduces the location and the triggering timing of most observed landslides. Based on that, potential effects of increasing precipitation intensity on slope stability are assessed.
M. Rutzinger, B. Höfle, R. Lindenbergh, S. Oude Elberink, F. Pirotti, R. Sailer, M. Scaioni, J. Stötter, and D. Wujanz
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-6, 15–22, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-6-15-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-6-15-2016, 2016
F. Pirotti, J. R. González-Olabarria, and E. Kutchartt
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 1763–1769, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1763-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1763-2023, 2023
Y. Cao and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 147–153, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-147-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-147-2023, 2023
M. Potůčková, J. Albrechtová, K. Anders, L. Červená, J. Dvořák, K. Gryguc, B. Höfle, L. Hunt, Z. Lhotáková, A. Marcinkowska-Ochtyra, A. Mayr, E. Neuwirthová, A. Ochtyra, M. Rutzinger, A. Šedová, A. Šrollerů, and L. Kupková
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 989–996, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-989-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-989-2023, 2023
R. Eskandari and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 1235–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1235-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1235-2023, 2023
G. Anjanappa, S. Nikoohemat, S. Oude Elberink, R. L. Vôute, and V. V. Lehtola
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-1-W1-2023, 461–468, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-461-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-461-2023, 2023
F. Pirotti, A. Guarnieri, S. Chiodini, and C. Bettanini
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-1-W1-2023, 581–587, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-581-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-581-2023, 2023
Y.-L. Wu, B. Alsadik, S. Oude Elberink, and G. Vosselman
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-1-W1-2023, 1105–1112, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-1105-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-1105-2023, 2023
Adriaan L. van Natijne, Thom A. Bogaard, Thomas Zieher, Jan Pfeiffer, and Roderik C. Lindenbergh
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3723–3745, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3723-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Landslides are one of the major weather-related geohazards. To assess their potential impact and design mitigation solutions, a detailed understanding of the slope is required. We tested if the use of machine learning, combined with satellite remote sensing data, would allow us to forecast deformation. Our results on the Vögelsberg landslide, a deep-seated landslide near Innsbruck, Austria, show that the formulation of such a machine learning system is not as straightforward as often hoped for.
Y. Cao and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W3-2023, 31–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-31-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-31-2023, 2023
Lukas Winiwarter, Katharina Anders, Daniel Czerwonka-Schröder, and Bernhard Höfle
Earth Surf. Dynam., 11, 593–613, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-593-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-593-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a method to extract surface change information from 4D time series of topographic point clouds recorded with a terrestrial laser scanner. The method uses sensor information to spatially and temporally smooth the data, reducing uncertainties. The Kalman filter used for the temporal smoothing also allows us to interpolate over data gaps or extrapolate into the future. Clustering areas where change histories are similar allows us to identify processes that may have the same causes.
J. Xu, M. Garramone, Y. Wang, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-2-2023, 1645–1652, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1645-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1645-2023, 2023
M. Garramone, D. Jovanovic, D. Oreni, L. Barazzetti, M. Previtali, F. Roncoroni, A. Mandelli, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-2-2023, 653–660, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-653-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-653-2023, 2023
R. Eskandari and M. Scaioni
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-M-1-2023, 79–86, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-M-1-2023-79-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-M-1-2023-79-2023, 2023
M. Garramone and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-5-W2-2023, 37–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-5-W2-2023-37-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-5-W2-2023-37-2023, 2023
J. Xu and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-5-W2-2023, 117–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-5-W2-2023-117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-5-W2-2023-117-2023, 2023
M. Previtali, L. Barazzetti, F. Roncoroni, Y. Cao, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W1-2023, 411–416, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-411-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-411-2023, 2023
M. Scaioni, A. Malekian, and D. Fugazza
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-1-2023, 293–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-1-2023-293-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-1-2023-293-2023, 2023
Lea Hartl, Thomas Zieher, Magnus Bremer, Martin Stocker-Waldhuber, Vivien Zahs, Bernhard Höfle, Christoph Klug, and Alessandro Cicoira
Earth Surf. Dynam., 11, 117–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The rock glacier in Äußeres Hochebenkar (Austria) moved faster in 2021–2022 than it has in about 70 years of monitoring. It is currently destabilizing. Using a combination of different data types and methods, we show that there have been two cycles of destabilization at Hochebenkar and provide a detailed analysis of velocity and surface changes. Because our time series are very long and show repeated destabilization, this helps us better understand the processes of rock glacier destabilization.
A. Malekian, D. Fugazza, and M. Scaioni
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-4-W1-2022, 459–466, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-459-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-459-2023, 2023
R. Eskandari and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W2-2022, 31–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W2-2022-31-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W2-2022-31-2023, 2023
D. Hulskemper, K. Anders, J. A. Á. Antolínez, M. Kuschnerus, B. Höfle, and R. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W2-2022, 53–60, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W2-2022-53-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W2-2022-53-2022, 2022
J. P. Meinderts, R. Lindenbergh, D. H. van der Heide, A. Amiri-Simkooei, and L. Truong-Hong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W2-2022, 69–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W2-2022-69-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W2-2022-69-2022, 2022
S. S. Khawte, M. N. Koeva, C. M. Gevaert, S. Oude Elberink, and A. A. Pedro
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W4-2022, 75–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W4-2022-75-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W4-2022-75-2022, 2022
L. Truong-Hong, R. C. Lindenbergh, and M. J. Vermeij
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W4-2022, 161–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W4-2022-161-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W4-2022-161-2022, 2022
F. Pirotti, E. Kutchartt, and M. Piragnolo
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W1-2022, 365–370, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-365-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-365-2022, 2022
Jan Pfeiffer, Thomas Zieher, Jan Schmieder, Thom Bogaard, Martin Rutzinger, and Christoph Spötl
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2219–2237, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2219-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2219-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The activity of slow-moving deep-seated landslides is commonly governed by pore pressure variations within the shear zone. Groundwater recharge as a consequence of precipitation therefore is a process regulating the activity of landslides. In this context, we present a highly automated geo-statistical approach to spatially assess groundwater recharge controlling the velocity of a deep-seated landslide in Tyrol, Austria.
Hannah Weiser, Jannika Schäfer, Lukas Winiwarter, Nina Krašovec, Fabian E. Fassnacht, and Bernhard Höfle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2989–3012, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2989-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2989-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
3D point clouds, acquired by laser scanning, allow us to retrieve information about forest structure and individual tree properties. We conducted airborne, UAV-borne and terrestrial laser scanning in German mixed forests, resulting in overlapping point clouds with different characteristics. From these, we generated a comprehensive database of individual tree point clouds and corresponding tree metrics. Our dataset may serve as a benchmark dataset for algorithms in forestry research.
F. Pirotti, M. Piragnolo, M. Yoshimura, J. P. Hernandez, M. A. Brovelli, B. Leblon, and M. Yamashita
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B5-2022, 45–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2022-45-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2022-45-2022, 2022
M. Garramone and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B4-2022, 39–45, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2022-39-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2022-39-2022, 2022
A. Nurunnabi, F. N. Teferle, R. C. Lindenbergh, J. Li, and S. Zlatanova
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2022, 59–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-59-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-59-2022, 2022
F. Pirotti, M. Piragnolo, A. Vettore, and A. Guarnieri
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2022, 353–359, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-353-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-353-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1-2022, 2022
K. K. Mwangangi, P. O. Mc’Okeyo, S. J. Oude Elberink, and F. Nex
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 433–440, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-433-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-433-2022, 2022
K. Anders, L. Winiwarter, D. Schröder, and B. Höfle
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 973–980, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-973-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-973-2022, 2022
H. S. Kathmann, A. L. van Natijne, and R. C. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 1033–1040, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1033-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1033-2022, 2022
M. Kuschnerus, R. Lindenbergh, Q. Lodder, E. Brand, and S. Vos
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 1055–1061, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1055-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1055-2022, 2022
A. B. Voordendag, B. Goger, C. Klug, R. Prinz, M. Rutzinger, and G. Kaser
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 1093–1099, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1093-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1093-2022, 2022
V. Zahs, L. Winiwarter, K. Anders, M. Bremer, M. Rutzinger, M. Potůčková, and B. Höfle
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 1109–1116, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1109-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1109-2022, 2022
A. H. Kanan and F. Pirotti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 625–632, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-625-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-625-2022, 2022
F. Tonion and F. Pirotti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 749–756, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-749-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-749-2022, 2022
E. Kutchartt, J. Hernández, P. Corvalán, Á. Promis, and F. Pirotti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 913–920, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-913-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-913-2022, 2022
F. Tonion and F. Pirotti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 1011–1017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1011-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1011-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-4-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-5-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-5-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-1-2022, 2022
L. Winiwarter, K. Anders, D. Schröder, and B. Höfle
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 79–86, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-79-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-79-2022, 2022
Y. Cao and M. Scaioni
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 219–226, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-219-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-219-2022, 2022
F. Dahle, J. Tanke, B. Wouters, and R. Lindenbergh
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 237–244, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-237-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-237-2022, 2022
A. Maiti, S. J. Oude Elberink, and G. Vosselman
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 275–282, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-275-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-275-2022, 2022
B. Hiebl, A. Mayr, A. Kollert, M. Rutzinger, M. Bremer, N. Helm, and K. Chytry
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 367–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-367-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-367-2022, 2022
L. Müller, M. Rutzinger, A. Mayr, and A. Kollert
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2022, 391–398, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-391-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2022-391-2022, 2022
L. Landrieu, E. Rupnik, S. Oude Elberink, C. Mallet, and N. Paparoditis
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2022, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-1-2022, 2022
E. Kutchartt, M. Pedron, and F. Pirotti
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2022, 431–438, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-431-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-431-2022, 2022
A. Nurunnabi, F. N. Teferle, D. F. Laefer, R. C. Lindenbergh, and A. Hunegnaw
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVI-2-W1-2022, 401–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-2-W1-2022-401-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-2-W1-2022-401-2022, 2022
M. Garramone, E. Tonelli, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVI-5-W1-2022, 95–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-5-W1-2022-95-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-5-W1-2022-95-2022, 2022
A. Nurunnabi, F. N. Teferle, J. Li, R. C. Lindenbergh, and S. Parvaz
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVI-4-W5-2021, 397–404, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W5-2021-397-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W5-2021-397-2021, 2021
Piera Belotti, Fabio Conzi, Chiara Dell’Orto, Maurizio Federici, Luigi Fregonese, Gabriele Garnero, Emilio Guastamacchia, Franco Guzzetti, Livio Pinto, and Marco Scaioni
Proc. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 4, 12, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-4-12-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-4-12-2021, 2021
R. G. Kippers, M. Koeva, M. van Keulen, and S. J. Oude Elberink
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVI-4-W4-2021, 49–54, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W4-2021-49-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W4-2021-49-2021, 2021
L. Truong-Hong, N. Nguyen, R. Lindenbergh, P. Fisk, and T. Huynh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVI-4-W4-2021, 119–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W4-2021-119-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W4-2021-119-2021, 2021
A. Nurunnabi, F. N. Teferle, J. Li, R. C. Lindenbergh, and A. Hunegnaw
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2021, 31–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2021-31-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2021-31-2021, 2021
Q. Bai, R. C. Lindenbergh, J. Vijverberg, and J. A. P. Guelen
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 115–122, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-115-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-115-2021, 2021
R. G. Kippers, L. Moth, and S. J. Oude Elberink
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 179–184, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-179-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-179-2021, 2021
Y. Cao and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 449–456, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-449-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-449-2021, 2021
M. Kuschnerus, D. Schröder, and R. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 745–752, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-745-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-745-2021, 2021
M. Previtali, M. Garramone, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 229–235, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-229-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-229-2021, 2021
K. Anders, L. Winiwarter, H. Mara, R. C. Lindenbergh, S. E. Vos, and B. Höfle
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2021, 137–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-137-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-137-2021, 2021
A. B. Voordendag, B. Goger, C. Klug, R. Prinz, M. Rutzinger, and G. Kaser
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2021, 153–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-153-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-153-2021, 2021
A. Kollert, M. Rutzinger, M. Bremer, K. Kaufmann, and T. Bork-Hüffer
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-4-2021, 201–208, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-201-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2021-201-2021, 2021
Mieke Kuschnerus, Roderik Lindenbergh, and Sander Vos
Earth Surf. Dynam., 9, 89–103, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-89-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-89-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Sandy coasts are areas that undergo a lot of changes, which are caused by different influences, such as tides, wind or human activity. Permanent laser scanning is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of a part of the coast continuously over an extended period. By comparing three unsupervised learning algorithms, we develop a methodology to analyse the resulting data set and derive which processes are dominating changes in the beach and dunes.
Veit Ulrich, Jack G. Williams, Vivien Zahs, Katharina Anders, Stefan Hecht, and Bernhard Höfle
Earth Surf. Dynam., 9, 19–28, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-19-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-19-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we use 3D point clouds to detect topographic changes across the surface of a rock glacier. These changes are presented as the relative contribution of surface change during a 3-week period to the annual surface change. By comparing these different time periods and looking at change in different directions, we provide estimates showing that different directions of surface change are dominant at different times of the year. This demonstrates the benefit of frequent monitoring.
M. Scaioni, L. Longoni, L. Zanzi, V. Ivanov, and M. Papini
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIV-3-W1-2020, 131–138, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-3-W1-2020-131-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-3-W1-2020-131-2020, 2020
F. Pirotti, E. Kutchartt, and E. Csaplovics
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W12-2020, 331–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-331-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-331-2020, 2020
M. Garramone, N. Moretti, M. Scaioni, C. Ellul, F. Re Cecconi, and M. C. Dejaco
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., VI-4-W1-2020, 77–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-VI-4-W1-2020-77-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-VI-4-W1-2020-77-2020, 2020
M. Previtali, L. Barazzetti, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 533–539, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-533-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-533-2020, 2020
F. Pirotti, C. Paterno, and M. Pividori
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 1055–1060, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1055-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1055-2020, 2020
E. Karantanellis, R. Arav, A. Dille, S. Lippl, G. Marsy, L. Torresani, and S. Oude Elberink
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 1099–1105, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1099-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1099-2020, 2020
E. Widyaningrum, M. K. Fajari, R. C. Lindenbergh, and M. Hahn
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 339–346, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-339-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-339-2020, 2020
L. Truong-Hong and R. C. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 501–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-501-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-501-2020, 2020
Y. Cao, M. Previtali, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 651–657, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-651-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-651-2020, 2020
D. Backes, M. Smigaj, M. Schimka, V. Zahs, A. Grznárová, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 1017–1024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1017-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1017-2020, 2020
M. Di Rita, D. Fugazza, V. Belloni, G. Diolaiuti, M. Scaioni, and M. Crespi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 1041–1048, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1041-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1041-2020, 2020
S. J. Oude Elberink
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 251–258, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-251-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-251-2020, 2020
I. Gutierrez, E. Før Gjermundsen, W. D. Harcourt, M. Kuschnerus, F. Tonion, and T. Zieher
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 719–726, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-719-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-719-2020, 2020
A. Mayr, M. Bremer, and M. Rutzinger
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 765–772, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-765-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-765-2020, 2020
L. Winiwarter, K. Anders, D. Wujanz, and B. Höfle
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 789–796, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-789-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-789-2020, 2020
H. Bernsteiner, N. Brožová, I. Eischeid, A. Hamer, S. Haselberger, M. Huber, A. Kollert, T. M. Vandyk, and F. Pirotti
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 431–437, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-431-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-431-2020, 2020
F. Tonion, F. Pirotti, G. Faina, and D. Paltrinieri
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 565–570, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-565-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-565-2020, 2020
Giovanni Forzieri, Matteo Pecchi, Marco Girardello, Achille Mauri, Marcus Klaus, Christo Nikolov, Marius Rüetschi, Barry Gardiner, Julián Tomaštík, David Small, Constantin Nistor, Donatas Jonikavicius, Jonathan Spinoni, Luc Feyen, Francesca Giannetti, Rinaldo Comino, Alessandro Wolynski, Francesco Pirotti, Fabio Maistrelli, Ionut Savulescu, Stéphanie Wurpillot-Lucas, Stefan Karlsson, Karolina Zieba-Kulawik, Paulina Strejczek-Jazwinska, Martin Mokroš, Stefan Franz, Lukas Krejci, Ionel Haidu, Mats Nilsson, Piotr Wezyk, Filippo Catani, Yi-Ying Chen, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Gherardo Chirici, Alessandro Cescatti, and Pieter S. A. Beck
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 257–276, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-257-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-257-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Strong winds may uproot and break trees and represent a risk for forests. Despite the importance of this natural disturbance and possible intensification in view of climate change, spatial information about wind-related impacts is currently missing on a pan-European scale. We present a new database of wind disturbances in European forests comprised of more than 80 000 records over the period 2000–2018. Our database is a unique spatial source for the study of forest disturbances at large scales.
J. Wang, H. B. Zheng, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W10, 235–243, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W10-235-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W10-235-2020, 2020
A. Mostafavi, M. Scaioni, and V. Yordanov
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W18, 765–772, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-765-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-765-2019, 2019
M. A. Brovelli, P. Boccardo, G. Bordogna, A. Pepe, M. Crespi, M. Munafò, and F. Pirotti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4-W14, 23–30, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W14-23-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W14-23-2019, 2019
J. Boehm, M. Rutzinger, B. Yang, M. Weinmann, B. Riveiro, and W. Yao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 915–917, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-915-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-915-2019, 2019
M. Bremer, V. Wichmann, M. Rutzinger, T. Zieher, and J. Pfeiffer
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 943–950, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-943-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-943-2019, 2019
R. Lindenbergh, S. van der Kleij, M. Kuschnerus, S. Vos, and S. de Vries
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1039–1046, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1039-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1039-2019, 2019
F. Pirotti and F. Tonion
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1105–1111, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1105-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1105-2019, 2019
L. Truong-Hong, D. F. Laefer, and R. C. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1135–1140, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1135-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1135-2019, 2019
B. B. van der Horst, R. C. Lindenbergh, and S. W. J. Puister
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1141–1148, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1141-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1141-2019, 2019
Y. Zang and R. C. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1169–1175, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1169-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1169-2019, 2019
E. Fissore and F. Pirotti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1539–1544, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1539-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1539-2019, 2019
V. Yordanov, D. Fugazza, R. S. Azzoni, M. Cernuschi, M. Scaioni, and G. A. Diolaiuti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1803–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1803-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1803-2019, 2019
G. Vosselman, S. J. Oude Elberink, and M. Y. Yang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1–1, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1-2019, 2019
Y. Ao, J. Wang, M. Zhou, R. C. Lindenbergh, and M. Y. Yang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 13–20, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-13-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-13-2019, 2019
K. Zhou, Y. Chen, I. Smal, and R. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 155–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-155-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-155-2019, 2019
H. K. Palanirajan, B. Alsadik, F. Nex, and S. Oude Elberink
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 495–502, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-495-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-495-2019, 2019
G. Vosselman, S. J. Oude Elberink, and M. Y. Yang
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 1–1, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-1-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-1-2019, 2019
J. Boehm, M. Rutzinger, B. Yang, M. Weinmann, B. Riveiro, and W. Yao
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 313–315, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-313-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-313-2019, 2019
K. Anders, R. C. Lindenbergh, S. E. Vos, H. Mara, S. de Vries, and B. Höfle
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 317–324, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-317-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-317-2019, 2019
A. Kumar, K. Anders, L Winiwarter, and B. Höfle
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-373-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-373-2019, 2019
A. Mayr, M. Bremer, M. Rutzinger, and C. Geitner
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 405–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-405-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-405-2019, 2019
J. Pfeiffer, T. Zieher, M. Rutzinger, M. Bremer, and V. Wichmann
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 421–428, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-421-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-421-2019, 2019
M. Soilán, R. Lindenbergh, B. Riveiro, and A. Sánchez-Rodríguez
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 445–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-445-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-445-2019, 2019
T. Zieher, M. Bremer, M. Rutzinger, J. Pfeiffer, P. Fritzmann, and V. Wichmann
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 461–467, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-461-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-461-2019, 2019
F. Pirotti, C. Zanchetta, M. Previtali, and S. Della Torre
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W11, 975–980, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-975-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-975-2019, 2019
V. Yordanov, A. Mostafavi, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W11, 1165–1172, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-1165-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-1165-2019, 2019
R. Brumana, V. Pracchi, F. Rinaudo, A. Grimoldi, M. Scaioni, L. Cantini, and M. Previtali
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W11, 1–2, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-1-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-1-2019, 2019
L. Díaz-Vilariño, E. Frías, M. Previtali, M. Scaioni, and J. Balado
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W11, 489–494, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-489-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-489-2019, 2019
C. E. Kilsedar, F. Fissore, F. Pirotti, and M. A. Brovelli
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W11, 669–673, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-669-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-669-2019, 2019
M. Piragnolo, S. Grigolato, and F. Pirotti
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3-W1, 33–40, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W1-33-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-W1-33-2019, 2019
Julia Boike, Jan Nitzbon, Katharina Anders, Mikhail Grigoriev, Dmitry Bolshiyanov, Moritz Langer, Stephan Lange, Niko Bornemann, Anne Morgenstern, Peter Schreiber, Christian Wille, Sarah Chadburn, Isabelle Gouttevin, Eleanor Burke, and Lars Kutzbach
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 261–299, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-261-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-261-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Long-term observational data are available from the Samoylov research site in northern Siberia, where meteorological parameters, energy balance, and subsurface observations have been recorded since 1998. This paper presents the temporal data set produced between 2002 and 2017, explaining the instrumentation, calibration, processing, and data quality control. Furthermore, we present a merged dataset of the parameters, which were measured from 1998 onwards.
D. Wujanz, L. Barazzetti, M. Previtali, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W9, 779–786, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-779-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-779-2019, 2019
Z. Hussnain, S. Oude Elberink, and G. Vosselman
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 203–209, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-203-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-203-2018, 2018
A. Masiero, F. Fissore, M. Piragnolo, A. Guarnieri, F. Pirotti, and A. Vettore
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 289–293, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-289-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-289-2018, 2018
F. Fissore and F. Pirotti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4, 193–200, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-193-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-193-2018, 2018
S. Nikoohemat, M. Koeva, S. J. Oude Elberink, and C. H. J. Lemmen
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4, 451–457, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-451-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-451-2018, 2018
M. Previtali, L. Díaz-Vilariño, and M. Scaioni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4, 507–514, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-507-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-507-2018, 2018
R. P. A. Bormans, R. C. Lindenbergh, and F. Karimi Nejadasl
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 141–148, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-141-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-141-2018, 2018
A. Mayr, M. Rutzinger, and C. Geitner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 691–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-691-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-691-2018, 2018
I. Puente, R. Lindenbergh, A. Van Natijne, R. Esposito, and R. Schipper
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 923–929, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-923-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-923-2018, 2018
B. Riveiro, G. Cubreiro, B. Conde, M. Cabaleiro, R. Lindenbergh, M. Soilán, and J. C. Caamaño
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 969–974, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-969-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-969-2018, 2018
M. Scaioni, J. Crippa, M. Corti, L. Barazzetti, D. Fugazza, R. Azzoni, M. Cernuschi, and G. A. Diolaiuti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1029–1036, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1029-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1029-2018, 2018
A. L. van Natijne, R. C. Lindenbergh, and R. F. Hanssen
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1137–1144, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1137-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1137-2018, 2018
J. Wang and R. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1163–1168, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1163-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1163-2018, 2018
E. Widyaningrum, R. C. Lindenbergh, B. G. H. Gorte, and K. Zhou
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1199–1205, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1199-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1199-2018, 2018
K. Zhou, B. Gorte, R. Lindenbergh, and E. Widyaningrum
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1229–1235, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1229-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1229-2018, 2018
T. Zieher, I. Toschi, F. Remondino, M. Rutzinger, Ch. Kofler, A. Mejia-Aguilar, and R. Schlögel
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 1243–1250, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1243-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1243-2018, 2018
S. Crommelinck, B. Höfle, M. N. Koeva, M. Y. Yang, and G. Vosselman
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2, 81–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-81-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-81-2018, 2018
F. Li, M. Lehtomäki, S. Oude Elberink, G. Vosselman, E. Puttonen, A. Kukko, and J. Hyyppä
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2, 185–192, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-185-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-185-2018, 2018
A. Rizaldy, C. Persello, C. M. Gevaert, and S. J. Oude Elberink
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2, 231–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-231-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-231-2018, 2018
S. R. Hosseini, M. Scaioni, and M. Marani
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 527–532, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-527-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-527-2018, 2018
M. Piragnolo, G. Lusiani, and F. Pirotti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 1381–1387, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1381-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1381-2018, 2018
M. Scaioni, B. Höfle, A. P. Baungarten Kersting, L. Barazzetti, M. Previtali, and D. Wujanz
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 1503–1510, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1503-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1503-2018, 2018
Davide Fugazza, Marco Scaioni, Manuel Corti, Carlo D'Agata, Roberto Sergio Azzoni, Massimo Cernuschi, Claudio Smiraglia, and Guglielmina Adele Diolaiuti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1055–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1055-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1055-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the surveys we performed in 2014 and 2016 by means of UAVs and terrestrial photogrammetry to monitor the Forni Glacier, one of the largest glaciers in the Italian Alps. We investigated the hazards related to the glacier collapse, which have been increasing recently due to the high ice melting rate. Our approach is feasible and low cost and we will repeatedly monitor the glacier to provide rapid hazard detection services to help the tourism sector.
M. Scaioni, L. Barazzetti, M. Corti, J. Crippa, R. S. Azzoni, D. Fugazza, M. Cernuschi, and G. A. Diolaiuti
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W4, 445–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-445-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-445-2018, 2018
M. Scaioni, J. Crippa, V. Yordanov, L. Longoni, V. I. Ivanov, and M. Papini
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W4, 453–460, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-453-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-453-2018, 2018
M. Cogliati, E. Tonelli, D. Battaglia, and M. Scaioni
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-5-W1, 9–16, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-W1-9-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-W1-9-2017, 2017
G. López-Pazos, J. Balado, L. Díaz-Vilariño, P. Arias, and M. Scaioni
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-5-W1, 35–41, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-W1-35-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-W1-35-2017, 2017
M. Scaioni, J. Crippa, L. Longoni, M. Papini, and L. Zanzi
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-5-W1, 63–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-W1-63-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-W1-63-2017, 2017
F. Fissore, F. Pirotti, and A. Vettore
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W8, 99–104, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W8-99-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W8-99-2017, 2017
S. Nikoohemat, M. Peter, S. Oude Elberink, and G. Vosselman
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W4, 355–362, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-355-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-355-2017, 2017
M. Scaioni, M. Corti, G. Diolaiuti, D. Fugazza, and M. Cernuschi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1547–1554, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1547-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1547-2017, 2017
Y. Shen, R. Lindenbergh, B. Hofland, and R. Kramer
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W4, 139–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-139-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-139-2017, 2017
K. Velumani, S. Oude Elberink, M. Y. Yang, and F. Baret
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W4, 149–156, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-149-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-149-2017, 2017
T. Zhang, G. Vosselman, and S. J. Oude Elberink
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W4, 193–198, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-193-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-193-2017, 2017
M. Hämmerle, N. Lukač, K.-C. Chen, Zs. Koma, C.-K. Wang, K. Anders, and B. Höfle
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W4, 59–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-59-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-59-2017, 2017
F. Li, S. Oude Elberink, and G. Vosselman
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 247–254, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-247-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-247-2017, 2017
F. Pirotti, M. Kobal, and J. R. Roussel
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 285–290, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-285-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-285-2017, 2017
Sabrina Marx, Katharina Anders, Sofia Antonova, Inga Beck, Julia Boike, Philip Marsh, Moritz Langer, and Bernhard Höfle
Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2017-49, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2017-49, 2017
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
Global climate warming causes permafrost to warm and thaw, and, consequently, to release the carbon into the atmosphere. Terrestrial laser scanning is evaluated and current methods are extended in the context of monitoring subsidence in Arctic permafrost regions. The extracted information is important to gain a deeper understanding of permafrost-related subsidence processes and provides highly accurate ground-truth data which is necessary for further developing area-wide monitoring methods.
Luisa Griesbaum, Sabrina Marx, and Bernhard Höfle
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1191–1201, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1191-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1191-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides a new method for flood documentation based on user-generated flood images. We demonstrate how flood elevation and building inundation depth can be derived from photographs by means of 3-D reconstruction of the scene. With an accuracy of 0.13 m ± 0.10 m, the derived building inundation depth can be used to facilitate damage assessment.
Thomas Zieher, Martin Rutzinger, Barbara Schneider-Muntau, Frank Perzl, David Leidinger, Herbert Formayer, and Clemens Geitner
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 971–992, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-971-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-971-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
At catchment scale, it is challenging to provide the required input parameters for physically based slope stability models. In the present study, the parameterization of such a model is optimized against observed shallow landslides during two triggering rainfall events. With the resulting set of parameters the model reproduces the location and the triggering timing of most observed landslides. Based on that, potential effects of increasing precipitation intensity on slope stability are assessed.
A. Nurunnabi, Y. Sadahiro, and R. Lindenbergh
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1-W1, 63–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-63-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-63-2017, 2017
M. Scaioni, E. Rosina, A. L’Erario, and L. Dìaz-Vilariño
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-5-W1, 153–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-153-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-153-2017, 2017
F. Pirotti, F. Sunar, and M. Piragnolo
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B7, 335–340, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-335-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-335-2016, 2016
V. Yordanov, M. Scaioni, M. T. Brunetti, M. T. Melis, A. Zinzi, and P. Giommi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B6, 17–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-17-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-17-2016, 2016
M. Scaioni, P. Giommi, M. T. Brunetti, C. Carli, P. Cerroni, G. Cremonese, G. Forlani, P. Gamba, M. Lavagna, M. T. Melis, M. Massironi, G. Ori, F. Salese, A. Zinzi, G. Xie, Z. Kang, R. Shi, Y. Sun, and Y. Wu
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B6, 71–78, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-71-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B6-71-2016, 2016
F. Pirotti, D. Travaglini, F. Giannetti, E. Kutchartt, F. Bottalico, and G. Chirici
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B7, 17–22, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-17-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-17-2016, 2016
J. Böhm, M. Bredif, T. Gierlinger, M. Krämer, R. Lindenberg, K. Liu, F. Michel, and B. Sirmacek
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B3, 301–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B3-301-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B3-301-2016, 2016
M. Rutzinger, B. Höfle, R. Lindenbergh, S. Oude Elberink, F. Pirotti, R. Sailer, M. Scaioni, J. Stötter, and D. Wujanz
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-6, 15–22, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-6-15-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-6-15-2016, 2016
S. Bechtold and B. Höfle
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-3, 161–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-3-161-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-III-3-161-2016, 2016
P. Jende, Z. Hussnain, M. Peter, S. Oude Elberink, M. Gerke, and G. Vosselman
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-3-W4, 19–26, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XL-3-W4-19-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XL-3-W4-19-2016, 2016
V. H. Phan, R. C. Lindenbergh, and M. Menenti
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-8-2425-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-8-2425-2014, 2014
Revised manuscript not accepted
J. F. Levinsen, K. Khvorostovsky, F. Ticconi, A. Shepherd, R. Forsberg, L. S. Sørensen, A. Muir, N. Pie, D. Felikson, T. Flament, R. Hurkmans, G. Moholdt, B. Gunter, R. C. Lindenbergh, and M. Kleinherenbrink
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-7-5433-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-7-5433-2013, 2013
Revised manuscript not accepted
V. H. Phan, R. C. Lindenbergh, and M. Menenti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4061–4077, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4061-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4061-2013, 2013
The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing is a non-governmental organization devoted to the development of international cooperation for the advancement of photogrammetry and remote sensing and their applications. The Society operates without any discrimination on grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political philosophy.
Useful Links
Useful External Links
Our Contact
c/o
Leibniz University Hannover
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation
Nienburger Str. 1
D-30167 Hannover
GERMANY
Email: isprs-sg@isprs.org