The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume XLIII-B3-2020
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 861–867, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-861-2020
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 861–867, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-861-2020

  21 Aug 2020

21 Aug 2020

INTER-COMPARISONS AMONG PASSIVE MICROWAVE SEA ICE CONCENTRATION PRODUCTS FROM FY-3D MWRI AND AMSR2

Y. Chen1, X. Zhao1, M. Qu1, Z. Cheng2, X. Pang1, and Q. Ji1 Y. Chen et al.
  • 1Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, China
  • 2Changjiang Spatial Information Technology Engineering Co., Ltd., Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, China

Keywords: Inter-comparisons, Sea Ice Concentration, FY-3D MWRI, AMSR2, Passive Microwave

Abstract. Passive microwave (PM) sensors on satellite can monitor sea ice distribution with their strengths of daylight- and weather-independent observations. Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI) sensor aboard on the Chinese FengYun-3D (FY-3D) satellites was launched in 2017 and provides continuous observation for Arctic sea ice since then. In this study, sea ice concentration (SIC) product is derived from brightness temperature (TB) data of MWRI, based on an Arctic Radiation and Turbulence Interaction Study Sea Ice (ASI) dynamic tie points algorithm. Our product is inter-compared with a published MWRI SIC product by the Enhanced NASA Team (NT2) algorithm, and three Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) SIC products by the ASI, Bootstrap (BST) and NT2 algorithm. Results show that MWRI SIC are generally higher than AMSR2 SIC and the median of monthly SIC differences are larger in summer. Regional analysis indicates that the smaller differences between AMSR2 SIC and MWRI-ASI SIC occur in the higher SIC areas, and the biases are within ±5% in the Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, East Siberian Sea, Canadian Archipelago Sea and Central Arctic Sea. There is the smallest SIC difference in the Central Arctic Sea with the biases of −0.77%, −0.60%, and 0.19% for AMSR2-ASI, AMSR2-BST and AMSR2-NT2, respectively. The trends of MWRI and AMSR2 sea ice extent and sea ice area are consistent with correlation coefficients all greater than 0.997. Besides, mean SIC, sea ice extent and sea ice area of MWRI-ASI are closer to those of AMSR2 than those of MWRI-NT2.