The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume XLIII-B3-2020
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 1055–1060, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1055-2020
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 1055–1060, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-1055-2020

  21 Aug 2020

21 Aug 2020

APPLICATION OF TREE DETECTION METHODS OVER LIDAR DATA FOR FOREST VOLUME ESTIMATION

F. Pirotti1,2, C. Paterno1, and M. Pividori1 F. Pirotti et al.
  • 1TeSAF Department, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy
  • 2CIRGEO Interdepartmental Research Center in Geomatics, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy

Keywords: Laser scanner, Forestry, Tree volume, Tree-detection

Abstract. Lidar (light detection and ranging) data are becoming more and more important in the analysis of the most relevant forest parameters. This study aims to compare the most recent segmentation methods for single trees using the ALS (Airborne Laser Scanning) point cloud and the CHM (Canopy Height Model). The methods used were the Li et al., method developed in 2012 and the Multi CHM method developed in 2015. The parameters analysed were the height and diameter for the individual trees and the volume and density for the entire forest. The efficiency of each method was verified by comparing the estimated parameters with those measured through 30 test areas. To better identify the useful parameters for the correct calibration of the algorithms, the population was divided into three layers according to the vertical structure and chronological class. From the comparison of the volumes obtained with the above methods and those calculated for the test areas, it emerges a tendency to over-segment for the Multi CHM method, while for the appropriately calibrated Li method there is a better correspondence to reality. The F-score values for the volumes obtained for the Li method are between 0.52 and 0.69 while for those obtained for the Multi CHM method are between 0.47 and 0.55. When compared with relascopic measures for each of the 48 parcels, a mean absolute difference ∼127 m3/ha and ∼141 m3/ha were found for Li2012 and MultiCHM respectively.