Volume XLII-4/W15
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4/W15, 47–52, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W15-47-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4/W15, 47–52, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W15-47-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  23 Sep 2019

23 Sep 2019

GEOBIM BENCHMARK 2019: INTERMEDIATE RESULTS

F. Noardo1, F. Biljecki2, G. Agugiaro1, K. Arroyo Ohori1, C. Ellul3, L. Harrie4, and J. Stoter1 F. Noardo et al.
  • 13D Geoinformation group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • 2Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 3Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London, UK
  • 4Department of Physical Geography, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Keywords: GeoBIM, software support, data interoperability, open standards, CityGML, IFC, 3D city models, BIM

Abstract. An investigation into the implementation state of open standards in software is currently ongoing through the ISPRS/EuroSDR ‘GeoBIM benchmark 2019’ initiative, which kicked off earlier this year. The benchmark activity provides a way of assessing and comparing the functionality of different software packages in GIS and BIM in terms of their ability to handle standardised data (IFC and CityGML) and undertake various tasks using this data. Approximately 65 people have registered to participate so far, with participants from a wide range of backgrounds and proposing to test a variety of software packages. This confirms that the issues under investigation are of interest, and also meets the wider benchmark aim of having a variety of participants, since the project is conceived as using a bottom-up approach with cross-disciplinary and cross-expertise participation. While full benchmark results are not due to be submitted until later this year, interim results have highlighted a number of common issues across multiple software packages, and a web meeting for participants held in July 2019 also led to some improvements in how the benchmark results are being captured.