OPTIMIZATION OF GROUND CONTROL POINT (GCP) CONFIGURATION FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) SURVEY USING STRUCTURE FROM MOTION (SFM)

38 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Optimization of the number and position of ground control point configured for UAV survey S. Stojković & B. Obrenović 10.5937/tehnika2106731S
2. Investigating Geomorphic Change Using a Structure from Motion Elevation Model Created from Historical Aerial Imagery: A Case Study in Northern Lake Michigan, USA J. DeWitt & F. Ashland 10.3390/ijgi12040173
3. Spatial Analysis of Intra-Annual Reed Ecosystem Dynamics at Lake Neusiedl Using RGB Drone Imagery and Deep Learning C. Buchsteiner et al. 10.3390/rs15163961
4. New Concept of Smart UAS-GCP: A Tool for Precise Positioning in Remote-Sensing Applications N. Famiglietti et al. 10.3390/drones8040123
5. SfM Photogrammetric Techniques Applied in the Building Archaeology Works of the Old Cloister of the Monastery of San Francisco from the 16th Century (Cazalla de la Sierra, Seville) M. León-Bonillo et al. 10.3390/heritage5040201
6. International exchange of geospatial information and cooperation in the field of land castras V. Goi et al. 10.36887/2415-8453-2024-1-36
7. Crop height estimation based on UAV images: Methods, errors, and strategies T. Xie et al. 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106155
8. Improving UAV‐SfM photogrammetry for modelling high‐relief terrain: Image collection strategies and ground control quantity W. Dai et al. 10.1002/esp.5665
9. Applicability of High-Resolution Geospatial Data Obtained by UAV Photogrammetry to Develop Drainage System Models for Pluvial Flood Analysis K. Park et al. 10.20965/jdr.2021.p0371
10. Pre‐dam valley reconstruction based on archival spatial data sources: Methods, accuracy, and 3D printing possibilities J. Pacina et al. 10.1111/tgis.12854
11. A New Method for High Resolution Surface Change Detection: Data Collection and Validation of Measurements from UAS at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, USA B. Crawford et al. 10.3390/drones5020025
12. Application and Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Survey Imagery after Salvage Logging in Different Terrain Conditions A. Đuka et al. 10.3390/f13122054
13. Optimization of Number of GCPs and Placement Strategy for UAV-Based Orthophoto Production D. Seo et al. 10.3390/app14083163
14. Validation of the positional accuracy of products resulting from the digital processing of UAV images L. Silva et al. 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v26n8p624-630
15. Polymodal Method of Improving the Quality of Photogrammetric Images and Models P. Burdziakowski 10.3390/en14123457
16. UAV Photogrammetry for Soil Surface Deformation Detection in a Timber Harvesting Area, South Korea J. Kim et al. 10.3390/f14050980
17. An Improved Ground Control Point Configuration for Digital Surface Model Construction in a Coal Waste Dump Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System H. Ren et al. 10.3390/rs12101623
18. Investigation of the effect of height difference and geometry of GCP on position accuracy of point cloud in UAV photogrammetry K. Hastaoglu et al. 10.1080/00396265.2022.2097998
19. Quantifying the Reliability of Volumetric and Areal Calculation with UAV-Generated DEMs: A Comparative Study with Ground Truth Data A. Hussein & S. Salih 10.25130/tjes.31.1.5
20. Combining Interior Orientation Variables to Predict the Accuracy of Rpas–Sfm 3D Models A. Capolupo et al. 10.3390/rs12172674
21. Optimization of Ground Control Point Distribution for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry for Inaccessible Fields K. Zhang et al. 10.3390/su14159505
22. An Automatic and Accurate Method for Marking Ground Control Points in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry L. Kong et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3224543
23. Photogrammetry (SfM) vs. Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) for Archaeological Excavations: Mosaic of Cantillana (Spain) as a Case Study C. Marín-Buzón et al. 10.3390/app112411994
24. CREATING A SCALE PLANE IN GIS USING UAV DATA M. Altyntsev et al. 10.33764/2618-981X-2020-1-1-86-92
25. Direct Georeferencing UAV-SfM in High-Relief Topography: Accuracy Assessment and Alternative Ground Control Strategies along Steep Inaccessible Rock Slopes P. Nesbit et al. 10.3390/rs14030490
26. Recent (2018–2021) glaciological, hydrological and geomorphological landscape changes of Hailuogou Glacier tongue, southeastern Tibetan Plateau S. Xu et al. 10.1080/17445647.2022.2147029
27. Surveying coastal cliffs using two UAV platforms (multirotor and fixed-wing) and three different approaches for the estimation of volumetric changes Á. Gómez-Gutiérrez & G. Gonçalves 10.1080/01431161.2020.1752950
28. High-Quality UAV-Based Orthophotos for Cadastral Mapping: Guidance for Optimal Flight Configurations C. Stöcker et al. 10.3390/rs12213625
29. Creation of high-precision digital elevation models using the GNSS UAV A. Gafurov et al. 10.35595/2414-9179-2021-2-27-327-339
30. UAV Platforms and the SfM-MVS Approach in the 3D Surveys and Modelling: A Review in the Cultural Heritage Field M. Pepe et al. 10.3390/app122412886
31. Use of gis technologies for geodesic assessment of land resources and cadastral activities I. Rozhi & B. Naradoviy 10.31548/zemleustriy2023.04.04
32. Considerations and tradeoffs of UAS-based coastal wetland monitoring in the Southeastern United States A. DiGiacomo et al. 10.3389/frsen.2022.924969
33. Real-time unmanned aerial vehicle surveying using spatial criteria: a simulated study D. Chatziparaschis & P. Partsinevelos 10.1117/1.JRS.17.014519
34. ENRICH: Multi-purposE dataset for beNchmaRking In Computer vision and pHotogrammetry D. Marelli et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.03.002
35. Hydrological Modeling for Determining Flooded Land from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images—Case Study at the Dniester River K. Burshtynska et al. 10.3390/rs15041071
36. Performance Analysis of a Drone Development Kit-derived Digital Elevation Model M. DOĞRULUK & İ. YALÇIN 10.30897/ijegeo.1344526
37. Influence of quantity, quality, horizontal and vertical distribution of ground control points on the positional accuracy of UAV survey D. D S et al. 10.1007/s12518-023-00531-w
38. GEODESY, CARTOGRAPHY AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY K. Burshtynska et al. 10.23939/istcgcap2022.95.053