Volume XLII-3
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 795-800, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-795-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 795-800, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-795-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  30 Apr 2018

30 Apr 2018

GROUNDING LINES DETECTING USING LANDSAT8 OLI AND CRYOSAT-2 DATA FUSION

F. Li, Y. Guo, Y. Zhang, and S. Zhang F. Li et al.
  • Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, China

Keywords: Grounding line, Landsat8 OLI, Cryosat-2, K-means, Slope, Merge

Abstract. The grounding zone is the region where ice transitions from grounded ice sheet to freely floating ice shelf, grounding lines are actually more of a zone, typically over several kilometers. The mass loss from Antarctica is strongly linked to changes in the ice shelves and their grounding lines, since the variation in the grounding line can result in very rapid changes in glacier and ice-shelf behavior. Based on remote sensing observations, five global Antarctic grounding line products have been released internationally, including MOA, ASAID, ICESat, MEaSUREs, and Synthesized grounding lines. However, the five products could not provide the annual grounding line products of the whole Antarctic, even some products have stopped updating, which limits the time series analysis of Antarctic material balance to a certain extent. Besides, the accurate of single remote-sensing data based grounding line products is far from satisficed. Therefore, we use algorithms to extract grounding lines with SAR and Cryosat-2 data respectively, and combine the results of two kinds of grounding lines to obtain new products, we obtain a mature grounding line extraction algorithm process, so that we can realize the extraction of grounding line of the Antarctic each year in the future. The comparison between fusion results and the MOA product results indicate that there is a maximum deviation of 188.67 meters between the MOA product and the fusion result.