Volume XLII-2
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 179-184, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-179-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 179-184, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-179-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  30 May 2018

30 May 2018

A FRAMEWORK FOR ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE HBIM SEMANTIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT

S. Brusaporci, P. Maiezza, and A. Tata S. Brusaporci et al.
  • Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy

Keywords: HBIM, Architectural Heritage, Semantization, Level of Development

Abstract. Despite the recognized advantages of the use of BIM in the field of architecture and engineering, the extension of this procedure to the architectural heritage is neither immediate nor critical.
The uniqueness and irregularity of historical architecture, on the one hand, and the great quantity of information necessary for the knowledge of architectural heritage, on the other, require appropriate reflections.
The aim of this paper is to define a general framework for the use of BIM procedures for architectural heritage.
The proposed methodology consists of three different Level of Development (LoD), depending on the characteristics of the building and the objectives of the study: a simplified model with a low geometric accuracy and a minimum quantity of information (LoD 200); a model nearer to the reality but, however, with a high deviation between virtual and real model (LoD 300); a detailed BIM model that reproduce as much as possible the geometric irregularities of the building and is enriched by the maximum quantity of information available (LoD 400).