Volume XLII-2/W7
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W7, 1017-1023, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1017-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W7, 1017-1023, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1017-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  13 Sep 2017

13 Sep 2017

THE ANALYSIS OF OBJECT-BASED CHANGE DETECTION IN MINING AREA: A CASE STUDY WITH PINGSHUO COAL MINE

M. Zhang1, W. Zhou1, and Y. Li2 M. Zhang et al.
  • 1School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China
  • 2School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

Keywords: Land use/cover monitoring, Object-based classification, Multi-temporal/multi-date object change detection, Openpit coal mine, Land reclamation, Remote sensing

Abstract. Accurate information on mining land use and land cover change are crucial for monitoring and environmental change studies. In this paper, RapidEye Remote Sensing Image (Map 2012) and SPOT7 Remote Sensing Image (Map 2015) in Pingshuo Mining Area are selected to monitor changes combined with object-based classification and change vector analysis method, we also used R in highresolution remote sensing image for mining land classification, and found the feasibility and the flexibility of open source software. The results show that (1) the classification of reclaimed mining land has higher precision, the overall accuracy and kappa coefficient of the classification of the change region map were 86.67 % and 89.44 %. It’s obvious that object-based classification and change vector analysis which has a great significance to improve the monitoring accuracy can be used to monitor mining land, especially reclaiming mining land; (2) the vegetation area changed from 46 % to 40 % accounted for the proportion of the total area from 2012 to 2015, and most of them were transformed into the arable land. The sum of arable land and vegetation area increased from 51 % to 70 %; meanwhile, build-up land has a certain degree of increase, part of the water area was transformed into arable land, but the extent of the two changes is not obvious. The result illustrated the transformation of reclaimed mining area, at the same time, there is still some land convert to mining land, and it shows the mine is still operating, mining land use and land cover are the dynamic procedure.