Volume XLII-2/W6
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W6, 407-413, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-407-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W6, 407-413, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-407-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  24 Aug 2017

24 Aug 2017

THE PREDICTION OF POSITION AND ORIENTATION PARAMETERS OF UAV FOR VIDEO IMAGING

D. Wierzbicki D. Wierzbicki
  • Department of Remote Sensing, Photogrammetry and Imagery Intelligence, Geodesy Institute, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 2 Kaliskiego st. Warsaw, Poland

Keywords: Photogrammetry, UAV, Navigation, Orientation determination, Accuracy

Abstract. The paper presents the results of the prediction for the parameters of the position and orientation of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with compact digital camera. Issue focus in this paper is to achieve optimal accuracy and reliability of the geo-referenced video frames on the basis of data from the navigation sensors mounted on UAV. In experiments two mathematical models were used for the process of the prediction: the polynomial model and the trigonometric model. The forecast values of position and orientation of UAV were compared with readings low cost GPS and INS sensors mounted on the unmanned Trimble UX-5 platform. Research experiment was conducted on the preview of navigation data from 23 measuring epochs. The forecast coordinate values and angles of the turnover and the actual readings of the sensor Trimble UX-5 were compared in this paper. Based on the results of the comparison it was determined that: the best results of co-ordinate comparison of an unmanned aerial vehicle received for the storage with, whereas worst for the coordinate Y on the base of both prediction models, obtained value of standard deviation for the coordinate XYZ from both prediction models does not cross over a admissible criterion 10 m for the term of the exactitudes of the position of a unmanned aircraft. The best results of the comparison of the angles of the turn of a unmanned aircraft received for the angle Pitch, whereas worst for the angles Heading and Roll on the base of both prediction models. Obtained value of standard deviation for the angles of turn HPR from both prediction models does not exceed a admissible exactitude 5° only for the angle Pitch, however crosses over this value for the angles Heading and Roll.