Volume XLII-2/W5
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W5, 237-244, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-237-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W5, 237-244, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-237-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  18 Aug 2017

18 Aug 2017

UAV PHOTGRAMMETRIC WORKFLOWS: A BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE

A. Federman1, M. Santana Quintero1, S. Kretz2, J. Gregg2, M. Lengies2, C. Ouimet2, and J. Laliberte3 A. Federman et al.
  • 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University – 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Canada
  • 2Public Services and Procurement Canada- Heritage Conservation Directorate- 30 Victoria Street, Gatineau, Canada
  • 3Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Canada

Keywords: UAVs, Aerial Photogrammetry, Built Heritage Documentation, Prince of Wales Fort

Abstract. The increasing commercialization of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has opened the possibility of performing low-cost aerial image acquisition for the documentation of cultural heritage sites through UAV photogrammetry. The flying of UAVs in Canada is regulated through Transport Canada and requires a Special Flight Operations Certificate (SFOC) in order to fly. Various image acquisition techniques have been explored in this review, as well as well software used to register the data. A general workflow procedure has been formulated based off of the literature reviewed. A case study example of using UAV photogrammetry at Prince of Wales Fort is discussed, specifically in relation to the data acquisition and processing. Some gaps in the literature reviewed highlight the need for streamlining the SFOC application process, and incorporating UAVs into cultural heritage documentation courses.