The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume XLII-2/W17
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W17, 225–232, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W17-225-2019
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W17, 225–232, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W17-225-2019

  29 Nov 2019

29 Nov 2019

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN LOW-COST HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION

A. Murtiyoso1, P. Grussenmeyer1, and D. Suwardhi2 A. Murtiyoso et al.
  • 1Photogrammetry and Geomatics Group, ICube Laboratory UMR 7357, INSA Strasbourg, France
  • 2Remote Sensing and GIS Group, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia

Keywords: heritage, photogrammetry, low-cost, drone, 360° camera

Abstract. The use of photogrammetry in 3D heritage documentation has matured over the recent years. In the same time, many types of sensors have also been developed in the field of imaging. While photogrammetry is considered as a low-cost alternative to TLS, several options exist in terms of sensor type with trade-offs between price, ease of use, and quality of resolution. Nevertheless, a proper knowledge on the acquisition and processing is still required to generate acceptable results. This paper aims to compare three photogrammetric sensors, namely a classical DSLR camera, a drone, and a spherical 360° camera in documenting heritage sites. Main comparison points include quality of the bundle adjustment and quality of the dense point cloud. However, an important point of the paper is also to determine whether a sensor at a given cost and effort is enough for documentation purposes. A TLS point cloud data was used as a common reference, as well as control and check points issued from geodetic surveying. In the aftermath of the comparison, several technical suggestions and recommendations were proposed as regards to the use of each sensor.