The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume XLII-2/W17
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W17, 209–215, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W17-209-2019
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W17, 209–215, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W17-209-2019

  29 Nov 2019

29 Nov 2019

RAPID RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF MULTIPLE CAMERA ARRAY USING IN-SITU DATA FOR UAV MULTISPECTRAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY

R. Minařík and J. Langhammer R. Minařík and J. Langhammer
  • Charles University, Faculty of Science, Dept. of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Albertov 6, Prague 2, 128 43, Czech Republic

Keywords: Radiometric Calibration, Multispectral Camera, Tetracam μMCA, Vignetting Reduction, Noise Reduction

Abstract. This study compares two possible radiometric calibration approaches of Tetracam μMCA Snap multispectral camera using the Dark offset subtraction and Look-Up Table (LUT) methods. A laboratory-based calibration using correction images taken under the controlled conditions was compared with a rapid in-situ based calibration featuring correction images taken during the field campaign. The hypothesis was that the accuracy of in-situ calibration could be comparable with the laboratory calibration, and thus could replace it and simplify the radiometric calibration process. The accuracy of calibration approaches was assessed by comparison of three validation targets reflectance values extracted from corrected UAV images based on laboratory and in-situ calibration with a reference spectroscopy measurement. The results of the field experiment showed that both calibration approaches led to significant accuracy improvement compared to raw data. The vignetting correction using resulted in a significant reduction of the Coefficient of variation by half in all bands and overall equalizing the DNs on the selected diagonal profile. The NRMSEs after processing all corrections ranged from 0.24 to 3.40%. Although the statistical testing revealed slightly better agreement of laboratory calibrated reflectance with reference data, the accuracy of in-situ calibration is sufficient, because the accuracy improvement quantified by the NRMSE is 2–10 times better using both calibration approaches compared to raw data than the NRMSE differences between them. These findings make the proposed in-situ approach usable for various environmental studies featuring UAV multispectral photogrammetry.