Volume XLII-2/W15
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W15, 285–290, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-285-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W15, 285–290, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-285-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  21 Aug 2019

21 Aug 2019

HBIM ORIENTED TOWARDS THE MASTER PLAN OF THE CHARTERHOUSE OF JEREZ (CÁDIZ, SPAIN)

M. Castellano-Román1 and F. Pinto-Puerto2 M. Castellano-Román and F. Pinto-Puerto
  • 1University of Seville, Dept. of Architectural Graphical Expression, Strategies of Heritage Knowledge (HUM799), Av. Reina Mercedes, 41012 Seville, Spain
  • 2University of Seville, Institute of Architecture and Building Science (IUACC), Av. Reina Mercedes, 41012 Seville, Spain

Keywords: HBIM, BIM, Heritage Management, Architectural Heritage, Charterhouse of Jerez

Abstract. This paper is focused on the possibilities of Heritage Building Information Modelling HBIM to enhance the strategic planning of large monuments ensembles in a Master Plan. The study case is the Charterhouse of Jerez (Cádiz, Spain), a monument acknowledged with the highest level of legal protection since 1856. Its HBIM model, developed with a Level of Knowledge LOK200, provides appropriate alphanumerical and graphical outputs for strategic decision-making on the major guidelines of heritage management: research, protection, conservation and dissemination. This LOK200 HBIM model emerges from the integration of graphic information produced with different techniques, from historic plans to photogrammetric surveys. In relation to research, the architectural analysis required to generate the HBIM model has defined its constructive elements and spaces, its construction process and the higher heritage potential areas. In addition, the synthetic views produced from the model have allowed unexpected relationships and conclusions about the monument. In relation to protection, a precise delimitation of the monument site and its surroundings have been defined. Furthermore, areas with different levels of vulnerability have been characterized. In relation to conservation, the severity of the damages in the main structures and the urgency of the interventions have been defined. In relation to dissemination, the relationship between its current religious use and the odds for public visit have been presented.