PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON OF DJI PHANTOM 4 PRO AND PHANTOM 4 RTK SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

37 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Quantifying decadal volumetric changes along sandy beaches using improved historical aerial photographic models and contemporary data R. Carvalho et al. 10.1002/esp.5130
2. Evaluating the Ability of Multi-Sensor Techniques to Capture Topographic Complexity H. Cooper et al. 10.3390/s21062105
3. Rice Height Monitoring between Different Estimation Models Using UAV Photogrammetry and Multispectral Technology W. Lu et al. 10.3390/rs14010078
4. UAV Remote Sensing for Campus Monitoring: A Comparative Evaluation of Nearest Neighbor and Rule-Based Classification A. Tiwari et al. 10.1007/s12524-020-01268-4
5. Performing low-altitude photogrammetric surveys, a comparative analysis of user-grade unmanned aircraft systems F. Mugnai et al. 10.1007/s12518-022-00421-7
6. Method for Estimating Solar Energy Potential Based on Photogrammetry from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles J. Fuentes et al. 10.3390/electronics9122144
7. On‐site geometric calibration of RPAS mounted sensors for SfM photogrammetric geomorphological surveys J. Senn et al. 10.1002/esp.5338
8. Early deformation structures connected to the progradation of a carbonate platform: The case of the Nuvolau Cassian platform (Dolomites - Italy) N. Menegoni et al. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105574
9. Nonlinear Analysis and Bifurcation Characteristics of Whirl Flutter in Unmanned Aerial Systems A. Quintana et al. 10.3390/drones5040122
10. Boosting the Timeliness of UAV Large Scale Mapping. Direct Georeferencing Approaches: Operational Strategies and Best Practices L. Teppati Losè et al. 10.3390/ijgi9100578
11. GEODESY, CARTOGRAPHY AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY O. Dorozhynskyy et al. 10.23939/istcgcap2020.92.015
12. Accuracy assessment of real-time kinematics (RTK) measurements on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for direct geo-referencing D. Ekaso et al. 10.1080/10095020.2019.1710437
13. Identifying Geomorphological Changes of Coastal Cliffs through Point Cloud Registration from UAV Images X. Kong 10.3390/rs13163152
14. Accuracy assessment of RTK-GNSS equipped UAV conducted as-built surveys for construction site modelling S. Varbla et al. 10.1080/00396265.2020.1830544
15. Measurement Accuracy and Improvement of Thematic Information from Unmanned Aerial System Sensor Products in Cultural Heritage Applications D. Kaimaris 10.3390/jimaging10020034
16. Surface Characteristics, Elevation Change, and Velocity of High-Arctic Valley Glacier from Repeated High-Resolution UAV Photogrammetry K. Lamsters et al. 10.3390/rs14041029
17. Centimetre-range deformations of built environment revealed by drone-based photogrammetry S. Varbla et al. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103787
18. Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Models for Façade and Building Reconstruction Using DJI Phantom 4 RTK Y. Taddia et al. 10.3390/rs12193144
19. Combined ground-based and UAS SfM-MVS approach for determination of geometric parameters of the large-scale industrial facility – Case study Ľ. Kovanič et al. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112994
20. Anatomy of a km-scale fault zone controlling the Oligo-Miocene bending of the Ligurian Alps (NW Italy): integration of field and 3D high-resolution digital outcrop model data L. Manna et al. 10.1186/s00015-023-00444-1
21. Studies on Three-Dimensional (3D) Accuracy Optimization and Repeatability of UAV in Complex Pit-Rim Landforms As Assisted by Oblique Imaging and RTK Positioning R. Bi et al. 10.3390/s21238109
22. Towards a Guideline for UAV-Based Data Acquisition for Geomorphic Applications D. Sarkar et al. 10.3390/rs15143692
23. Evaluation of the Influence of Processing Parameters in Structure-from-Motion Software on the Quality of Digital Elevation Models and Orthomosaics in the Context of Studies on Earth Surface Dynamics S. Śledź & M. Ewertowski 10.3390/rs14061312
24. Kısıtlı Sulama Uygulamalarının İHA Multispektral Algılamaya Dayalı Vejetasyon İndekslerine Etkisi S. DEMİR & L. BAŞAYİĞİT 10.29133/yyutbd.910909
25. UAV-g 2019: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Geomatics . Nex 10.3390/drones3030074
26. Accuracy assessment of topographic measurements and monitoring of topographic changes using RTK-UAV in landslide area caused by 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake Y. Nakata et al. 10.5738/jale.25.43
27. Photogrammetry Using UAV-Mounted GNSS RTK: Georeferencing Strategies without GCPs M. Štroner et al. 10.3390/rs13071336
28. High-Resolution Estimates of Fire Severity—An Evaluation of UAS Image and LiDAR Mapping Approaches on a Sedgeland Forest Boundary in Tasmania, Australia S. Hillman et al. 10.3390/fire4010014
29. Effect of photography method and analysis settings in SfM without GCP by using RTK-UAV : investigation using along-road experiment data M. TAKATA et al. 10.4287/jsprs.60.211
30. Coastal Mapping Using DJI Phantom 4 RTK in Post-Processing Kinematic Mode Y. Taddia et al. 10.3390/drones4020009
31. Image Mapping Accuracy Evaluation Using UAV with Standalone, Differential (RTK), and PPP GNSS Positioning Techniques in an Abandoned Mine Site H. Kim et al. 10.3390/s23135858
32. Accuracy assessment of RTK/PPK UAV-photogrammetry projects using differential corrections from multiple GNSS fixed base stations P. Martínez-Carricondo et al. 10.1080/10106049.2023.2197507
33. Evaluation of the Georeferencing Accuracy of a Photogrammetric Model Using a Quadrocopter with Onboard GNSS RTK M. Štroner et al. 10.3390/s20082318
34. Unmanned Aircraft System Photogrammetry for Mapping Diverse Vegetation Species in a Heterogeneous Coastal Wetland S. Durgan et al. 10.1007/s13157-020-01373-7
35. Accuracy assessment of post‐processing kinematic georeferencing based on uncrewed aerial vehicle‐based structures from motion multi‐view stereo photogrammetry M. Hayamizu & Y. Nakata 10.1111/1745-5871.12624
36. The UAS-Based 3D Image Characterization of Mozarabic Church Ruins in Bobastro (Malaga), Spain C. Enríquez et al. 10.3390/rs12152377
37. Rapid Assessment of Landslide Dynamics by UAV-RTK Repeated Surveys Using Ground Targets: The Ca’ Lita Landslide (Northern Apennines, Italy) G. Ciccarese et al. 10.3390/rs16061032