Volume XLII-2/W11
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W11, 37-41, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-37-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W11, 37-41, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-37-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  04 May 2019

04 May 2019

THREE-DIMENSIONAL SURVEY OF GUATTARI CAVE WITH TRADITIONAL AND MOBILE PHONE CAMERAS

L. Alessandri1, V. Baiocchi2, S. Del Pizzo3, F. Di Ciaccio3, M. Onori2, M. F. Rolfo4, and S. Troisi3 L. Alessandri et al.
  • 1University of Groningen, GIA, Poststraat 6, 9712ER, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • 2Sapienza University of Rome, DICEA, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy
  • 3Parthenope University of Naples, Centro Direzionale Isola C4, Naples, Italy
  • 4University of Tor Vergata, Department of History, Culture and Society, Via Columbia 1, 00133 Rome, Italy

Keywords: Photogrammetry, Structure from Motion, Cultural Heritage, 3D modeling, Georeferencing, Neandertal, Pleistocene

Abstract. Sometimes, the georeferencing of a cave in the global reference system can be challenging. Some difficulties may arise when narrow passages do not allow the use of classical topographic equipment or a terrestrial laser scanner. In these specific cases, the surveyor can employ a visual-based approach to produce both the followed path and the 3D model of the hypogeum. The report we are presenting is the result of a survey in the Guattari cave carried out using images taken by a Huawei P9 mobile phone and a Nikon D800E camera with a 16 mm fisheye lens. Several targets were measured in order to contain the deformation of the models. Three GCPs located just outside the cave have been used to georeference the models. The data have been acquired by a double frequency GNSS receiver in static session mode. The comparison between the two models shows a substantial concordance only in the area outside the cave where the GCPs were measured. In the innermost areas, the two models differ by as much as two meters.