Volume XLII-2/W10
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W10, 101-106, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W10-101-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W10, 101-106, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W10-101-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  17 Apr 2019

17 Apr 2019

BATHYMETRIC SURVEYING IN LAKE SUPERIOR: 3D MODELING AND SONAR EQUIPMENTS COMPARING

E. Levin1, G. Meadows2, R. Shults1, U. Karacelebi1, and H. S. Kulunk1 E. Levin et al.
  • 1Michigan Technological University, School of Technology, Townsend Drive, 1400 Houghton, 49931, USA
  • 2Michigan Technological University, Great Lakes Research Center, Townsend Drive, 1400 Houghton, 49931, USA

Keywords: bathymetric surveying, autonomous underwater vehicles, sonar, seabed, profile

Abstract. This paper represents the overview of hydrographic surveying and different types of modern and traditional surveying equipment, and data acquisition using the traditional single beam sonar system and a modern fully autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) IVER3. During the study, the data sets were collected using the vehicles of the Great Lake Research Center at Michigan Technological University. This paper presents how to process and edit the bathymetric data on SonarWiz5. Lastly, it compares the accuracy of the two different sonar systems in the different missions and creates 3D models to display and understand the elevations changes. Moreover, the 3D models were created after importing the data sets in the same coordinate system. In this study, the data sets were recorded by two different sensors in the two study locations in the Keweenaw Waterway in Michigan, U.S. between the cities of Houghton and Hancock. The first one equipment is the Lowrance HDS-7 sonar on the surveying boat, and other one is the EdgeTech 2205 sonar on the fully AUV of IVER3. One of the purposes of this study is to explore the sonar post processing programs, which are very important to interpret sonar and bathymetric data, and obtained the same coordinate system of the study areas. During the project, three main processing programs were used. The first one is UnderSee Explorer 2.6, which has been used to process the data sets of Polar SV boat. Secondly, EdgeTech Discover 4600 bathymetric software used EdgeTech 2205 sonar data sets to create bathymetric files that were used in SonarWiz5. Lastly, SonarWiz5 sonar processing software can be used to process the data sets. After the data acquisition and the data process, six profiles from the first study area and the five profiles from the second study are created to compare the data sets and elevations difference. It is shown that single beam sonar might miss some details, such as pipeline and quick elevation changes on seabed when we compare to the side scan sonar of IVER3 because the single side scan sonar can acquire better resolutions to understand the 3D features, such as pipelines, reliefs etc.