Volume XLII-1
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 101-106, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-101-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 101-106, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-101-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  26 Sep 2018

26 Sep 2018

MODELLING ERRORS IN X-RAY FLUOROSCOPIC IMAGING SYSTEMS USING PHOTOGRAMMETRIC BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT WITH A DATA-DRIVEN SELF-CALIBRATION APPROACH

J. C. K. Chow1,2, D. D. Lichti3, K. D. Ang2,4, K. Al-Durgham3, G. Kuntze5, G. Sharma5, and J. Ronsky5 J. C. K. Chow et al.
  • 1Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • 2Department of Research and Development, Vusion Technologies, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • 3Department of Geomatics Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • 4Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • 5Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Keywords: Radiology, X-Ray, Fluoroscopy, Error Modelling, Calibration, Machine Learning, Bundle Adjustment, Biomedical Imaging, Biomechanics

Abstract. X-ray imaging is a fundamental tool of routine clinical diagnosis. Fluoroscopic imaging can further acquire X-ray images at video frame rates, thus enabling non-invasive in-vivo motion studies of joints, gastrointestinal tract, etc. For both the qualitative and quantitative analysis of static and dynamic X-ray images, the data should be free of systematic biases. Besides precise fabrication of hardware, software-based calibration solutions are commonly used for modelling the distortions. In this primary research study, a robust photogrammetric bundle adjustment was used to model the projective geometry of two fluoroscopic X-ray imaging systems. However, instead of relying on an expert photogrammetrist’s knowledge and judgement to decide on a parametric model for describing the systematic errors, a self-tuning data-driven approach is used to model the complex non-linear distortion profile of the sensors. Quality control from the experiment showed that 0.06 mm to 0.09 mm 3D reconstruction accuracy was achievable post-calibration using merely 15 X-ray images. As part of the bundle adjustment, the location of the virtual fluoroscopic system relative to the target field can also be spatially resected with an RMSE between 3.10 mm and 3.31 mm.