The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume XLI-B5
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B5, 895–902, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-895-2016
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B5, 895–902, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-895-2016

  16 Jun 2016

16 Jun 2016

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF A UAV-BASED LANDSLIDE MONITORING SYSTEM

M. V. Peppa1, J. P. Mills1, P. Moore1, P. E. Miller2, and J. E. Chambers3 M. V. Peppa et al.
  • 1School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • 2The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, UK
  • 3British Geological Survey, Keyworth Nottingham, UK

Keywords: Landslides, UAV, structure-from-motion, georeferencing, bundle adjustment, DEM

Abstract. Landslides are hazardous events with often disastrous consequences. Monitoring landslides with observations of high spatio-temporal resolution can help mitigate such hazards. Mini unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) complemented by structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and modern per-pixel image matching algorithms can deliver a time-series of landslide elevation models in an automated and inexpensive way. This research investigates the potential of a mini UAV, equipped with a Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 compact camera, to provide surface deformations at acceptable levels of accuracy for landslide assessment. The study adopts a self-calibrating bundle adjustment-SfM pipeline using ground control points (GCPs). It evaluates misalignment biases and unresolved systematic errors that are transferred through the SfM process into the derived elevation models. To cross-validate the research outputs, results are compared to benchmark observations obtained by standard surveying techniques. The data is collected with 6 cm ground sample distance (GSD) and is shown to achieve planimetric and vertical accuracy of a few centimetres at independent check points (ICPs). The co-registration error of the generated elevation models is also examined in areas of stable terrain. Through this error assessment, the study estimates that the vertical sensitivity to real terrain change of the tested landslide is equal to 9 cm.